Failure to Treat in Massachusetts
Average Settlement: $250,000 - $750,000 | Statute: 3 years from the date the cause of action accrues
About Failure to Treat
Failure to treat occurs when a healthcare provider correctly diagnoses a condition but fails to provide appropriate treatment, refer the patient to a specialist, or follow established treatment protocols. This form of malpractice can be particularly frustrating for patients who sought care, received a correct diagnosis, and then experienced harm because the necessary next steps were never taken. These cases often involve systemic issues such as overloaded physicians, poor follow-up systems, or cost-driven treatment decisions.
Massachusetts Medical Malpractice Laws
Statute of Limitations
3 years from the date the cause of action accrues
Damage Cap
$500,000 non-economic damages (with exceptions: the cap does not apply if there is a substantial or permanent loss of bodily function, disfigurement, or other special circumstances)
Discovery Rule
Massachusetts applies the discovery rule, tolling the statute until the plaintiff discovers or should have discovered the injury, subject to a 7-year statute of repose.
Pre-Filing Requirements
Claims must be reviewed by a tribunal (judge, physician, attorney) that determines if the evidence is sufficient to raise a legitimate question of liability.
Common Examples of Failure to Treat
- •Failing to prescribe appropriate medication after diagnosing a treatable condition
- •Not referring a patient to a specialist when the condition requires specialized care
- •Discharging a patient without an adequate treatment or follow-up plan
- •Ignoring or failing to act on abnormal test results that confirm a known diagnosis
- •Failure to provide appropriate post-surgical care or rehabilitation
- •Not ordering necessary follow-up imaging or biopsies after an initial diagnosis
- •Providing treatment that is outdated or inconsistent with current clinical guidelines
Key Facts
- ✓Failure to treat is legally distinct from misdiagnosis — the provider identified the condition correctly but did not act on it appropriately
- ✓Clinical practice guidelines from medical specialty organizations are often introduced as evidence to show what the standard treatment should have been
- ✓These cases frequently involve gaps in care coordination, particularly when multiple providers or healthcare systems are involved in a patient's treatment
- ✓Electronic health records that show a diagnosis was documented but no corresponding treatment plan was entered can be powerful evidence of failure to treat
- ✓Insurance-driven treatment denials may contribute to failure to treat, but the treating physician still has a legal duty to advocate for and pursue medically necessary care
- ✓Expert testimony in these cases typically focuses on what a competent physician in the same specialty would have done after reaching the same diagnosis
- ✓Massachusetts requires a medical malpractice tribunal hearing to assess whether the case has sufficient merit before it can proceed.
- ✓If the tribunal finds insufficient evidence, the plaintiff may still proceed by posting a bond (typically $6,000).
- ✓The $500,000 non-economic damages cap has broad exceptions for severe injuries, making it effectively inapplicable in many serious cases.
- ✓Massachusetts follows a modified comparative negligence system with a 51% bar.
Victim of Failure to Treat in Massachusetts?
Get a free case evaluation. Most medical malpractice attorneys work on contingency.
Calculate Your Settlement →Failure to Treat in Other States
Other Malpractice Types in Massachusetts
This information is for educational purposes only and is not legal advice. Consult a licensed medical malpractice attorney in Massachusetts.